IEEE: A radical new router ?
robert.stratton at stratton.net
Tue Jul 7 22:07:32 CDT 2009
Au contraire... I was at the Industry Day for DARPA's Military Networking Protocol Program and I assure you that Anagran is popular among some in that set.
I wouldn't necessarily say things are "wired" for them amongst some customers, but they certainly have mindshare.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
andre kesteloot writes:
Ah yes, Larry Roberts espousing flows in the core (again). Been
there, done that, got the T-shirt. Cisco 1995 I believe it was - a
bitter vintage with a distinct note of panic at being behind the power
curve. Perhaps mo would care to elaborate in his inimitable fashion.
Not only has this been shown to be in practice a Bad Thing (in the
core of the Internet, you don't necessarily see discernable "flows"
and the opposing directions of a session are often taking entirely
different paths so you'd see only one side anyway), but if one
actually tried to pay attention to groups of packets and create/tear
down state for special treatment as groups come and go, at higher
speeds that ends up being *all* one is doing. Opens up a tremendous
vector for attacks of various types; even unintended side effects of
self-propagating software that scans a lot can give you a pretty
I don't think this is going anywhere - I don't know anybody who's
spending money on Anagran boxes just as I never actually saw Caspian
kit in the wild.
Tacos mailing list
Tacos at amrad.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tacos