YouTube - Large Hadron Collider - The Search For The Higgs [2 of 3]
Philip Miller Tate
Philmt59 at aol.com
Fri Jul 31 13:56:14 CDT 2009
Er, sorry - did you write, "... that WILL form ..."?
On 31 Jul 2009, at 17:47, Alberto di Bene wrote:
> Alex Fraser wrote:
>> Would you say this project is more complex than the moon
>> landing? I'm grasping for a metric on complexity.
> I am not familiar with the landing on the Moon (never been
> there... :-), so I can't gauge its complexity.
> I don't know if they had to bring about 1600 superconducting
> magnets at less than 2 Kelvin using many tens of tons of
> liquid helium, or to dig a tunnel 27 km in circumference at about
> 100m underground.
> A difference I can spot are the consequences of possible errors in
> the underlying theory. In the case of Moon landing,
> had the scientists made errors in their computations, only the life
> of three persons was at risk.
> In the case of the LHC, if the computations done on the size and
> the lifespan of the micro black holes that will form
> as a consequence of the proton - antiproton collisions are wrong,
> well, the existence of the earth itself is at risk....
> But all the physicists (me included) are confident that those micro
> black holes will evaporate in no time, as predicted
> by the theory of Hawking-Bekenstein... see http://
> And if Hawking and Bekenstein were wrong, well, nobody will have a
> chance to complain.... :-)
> To follow the current status of the LHC at CERN, go here :
> 73 Alberto i2PHD
> Tacos mailing list
> Tacos at amrad.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tacos